Resale Platform Fee Structures Compared
Hidden fees stack differently across platforms, changing your actual payout.

A 10% fee sounds like 10% of your money walks out the door and the rest is yours. It almost never works that way. Most resale platforms stack at least two or three separate charges on every transaction, so the commission percentage a platform advertises is never the full cost of selling there. These charges stack together, and the number on the homepage stops meaning much.
Whether that percentage applies to the item price alone, or to the item price plus shipping, is a structural choice, not a rounding error, and it rarely matches the advertised rate.
Two platforms can post the exact same headline percentage and hand two sellers very different checks for the identical sale. The rest of this piece walks through why, platform by platform, dollar by dollar, and what to actually do with that information.
How each major platform builds its fee on a single sale
No two platforms build their fee the same way, so each one needs to be read on its own terms rather than averaged into a single rule of thumb.
Reclaim: Sell with AI takes a photo and turns it into a finished listing, then routes sellers toward the marketplaces best suited to what they're selling. Knowing how each of those marketplaces actually charges for a sale is the exact knowledge a seller needs before picking a channel, which is the job the rest of this section does.
Facebook Marketplace splits into two very different pricing worlds depending on how the item moves. Sell local and get paid in cash or through an app like Venmo, and Facebook charges nothing at all, because Facebook never touches the money. If you ship the item instead, a percentage-based selling fee applies to the entire order amount, shipping included, with a minimum charge per order. That fee already bundles in payment processing, so there's no separate processing charge layered on top for shipped sales. If you haven't shipped an item through Facebook recently, you should check the current rate before running your numbers, because the shipped fee has moved upward from where it used to sit.
eBay charges 13.6% of the total sale amount for most categories, plus a small fixed charge per order that scales with the size of the sale. Category affects the rate: guitars and basses carry a noticeably lower rate, while women's handbags and jewelry carry a higher one. Listing is free up to a set number of items per month for sellers without a Store, but after that a small per-listing fee kicks in, and that rate drops considerably for higher-value listings once a seller crosses into Store territory.
Poshmark runs a simpler, blunter structure. Anything under a low dollar threshold pays a flat fee. Anything at or above it pays a flat 20% commission, applied to the item price only, not the shipping charge, because Poshmark issues its own flat-rate prepaid label and keeps shipping out of the fee calculation. That flat fee on cheap items creates a surprisingly high effective rate on anything sold for a few dollars. Bundling smaller items together tends to perform better on Poshmark than listing them one at a time.
Depop's US fee structure makes for one of the more deceptively simple headlines in resale. Eligible new listings carry no selling commission at all, but a payment processing fee still applies to every sale, and if a seller wants extra visibility, optional boosting adds a further percentage on top. Zero commission is accurate. It's also not the whole bill. That lack of commission applies specifically to Depop (US) sellers.
Etsy charges a per-listing fee on top of a transaction fee and a payment processing fee, with advertising charges layered in for sellers who opt into them. Even items that never sell cost money to list, an overhead most other resale platforms simply don't charge. Etsy fits qualifying vintage inventory, not ordinary modern resale.
Grailed charges a commission plus payment processing, and the combined rate runs noticeably higher than the commission number alone suggests. Commission applies to item price only, not shipping, and the category focus (menswear, streetwear) matters for where this platform fits later on.
Vinted flips the model entirely: zero seller fees, full stop, because Vinted charges its service fee to the buyer instead. Whatnot specializes in live-selling, with its own separate fee structure built around that auction-style format, and it fits collectibles and live-auction sales rather than everyday decluttering.
| Platform | Commission | Applies to | Processing | Per-order / listing fee | |---|---|---|---|---| | Facebook Marketplace (local) | None | N/A | N/A | None | | Facebook Marketplace (shipped) | Percentage on total order | Item + shipping | Included | Minimum charge per order | | eBay | 13.6% (most categories) | Total sale amount | Included | Small fixed charge per order | | Poshmark | 20% (or flat fee under threshold) | Item price only | Included | None | | Depop (US) | None on eligible listings | N/A | Separate fee applies | None | | Etsy | Transaction fee | Item price | Separate fee applies | Per-listing fee | | Grailed | Commission | Item price only | Separate fee applies | None | | Vinted | None (seller side) | N/A | N/A | None |
The Fee Gap on the Same Item
The rate cards look similar, but the differences are not academic. But run an actual sale through each one, and the gaps turn into real dollars fast, especially on cheaper items where there isn't much margin to spare.
At the same price point in most categories, Facebook Marketplace's shipped fee comes in meaningfully lower than eBay's, a gap worth several dollars before you even account for the cost of the item itself or the shipping you pay out of pocket. That gap matters a lot on thin-margin resale, but it shrinks once a platform can command a genuinely higher sale price, which the next section gets into.
Facebook's shipped fee applies to the full order total, shipping included, so an item that ships with a hefty box and a heavy shipping charge produces a bigger fee base than the sticker price alone would suggest.
Poshmark tells a similar story from the other direction. Poshmark's higher rate on a given item produces a larger absolute take than eBay's lower rate on the same item, but Poshmark's commission applies to item price only, which narrows the gap slightly when shipping is large. Vinted sellers keep the entire listed price, because Vinted charges its fee to the buyer instead, but that cost doesn't just vanish. It appears in what buyers are willing to pay at a given list price, because they're doing their own math on the other side of the transaction.
Depop's processing fee tells the quiet version of this story. On a low-price item, that fee eats a chunk big enough that the "zero commission" headline ends up overstating what actually lands in the seller's account. None of these numbers are complicated on their own. Stacked together across a season of selling, they add up to a genuinely different bottom line depending on where the listing went up.
Why the lower-fee platform is not always the higher-profit platform
The obvious move, after reading the last section, is to just list everything on whichever platform takes the smallest cut.
A platform charging lower fees can still leave a seller with less money if its buyer pool bids the item down or never sees it. eBay costs more per sale than Facebook Marketplace, and eBay can still be the higher-profit choice on items that local buyers would lowball. Facebook Marketplace's buyers are local and proximity-driven. eBay's buyers are national, searching by keyword, and there are hundreds of millions of them worldwide. For a niche collectible, the eBay buyer who searches the exact model number is competing against other buyers doing the same search. The local Facebook buyer is just trying to get a deal.
That's the test worth actually running: hold the item fixed, estimate the realistic sale price on each platform (not the identical price on both), and compare what lands after fees on each one. Two different platforms rarely produce the same sale price for the same item, so comparing fee percentages alone skips the factor that actually decides the outcome.
The obvious objection: just list it on Facebook Marketplace at the same price eBay buyers would pay, and keep the fee savings as pure upside. It doesn't work that way in practice. Local buyers show up expecting to negotiate, and they rarely bid against anyone else for the same item. That negotiation dynamic quietly drags the final price down on exactly the items where a national pool of competing buyers would have pushed the price up instead. The savings on fees get eaten by the discount the buyer successfully talks the seller into. Most sellers underestimate their total costs for the same reason: they fixate on the advertised commission and miss the processing fees and shipping-inclusive math that compound on top of it, producing the gap. Reclaim: Sell with AI calculates payouts against real market pricing data before anything gets published, so a seller knows the full fee stack going in rather than discovering the gap after the sale has already closed.
Matching item type to platform based on fee structure and buyer pool together
The right platform for any given item comes from combining two things: how that platform charges for the sale, and how deep its buyer pool runs for that specific category. Putting those together by item type makes the routing more concrete.
Bulky, heavy, or awkward items (furniture, appliances, exercise equipment) belong on Facebook Marketplace for local pickup. You have no platform fee and no shipping cost to absorb, and for anything heavy enough to need a dolly, shipping cost alone usually wipes out whatever fee savings a national platform might offer.
Niche collectibles, electronics, and shippable brand-name items belong on eBay. Retro gaming consoles, cameras, power tools, and LEGO sets all have specific model identities that buyers search for by name, and that kind of targeted search traffic is what eBay's national buyer pool is built around.
Mainstream fashion and clothing bundles do well on Poshmark, where the fashion-focused discovery workflow often makes up for the 20% commission through faster, more reliable turnover. Vintage-inspired pieces, streetwear, and trend-led fashion fit Depop better, because US sellers get lower effective fees and the buyer base is already there looking for exactly that kind of item. Menswear and streetwear specifically also belong on Grailed, where the category-specific buyer pool justifies an all-in rate running roughly ten to thirteen percent depending on sale price.
It's not the right channel for ordinary secondhand goods just because they're old.
Musical instruments do well across Reverb, Facebook Marketplace, and eBay, and eBay in particular is more competitive for instruments than its general rate suggests, since guitars and basses carry a noticeably lower category rate. Video games and trading cards point back to eBay, with BrickLink as the dedicated channel for LEGO and PriceCharting as the tool for benchmarking price before listing anywhere at all.
Because fee structures swing so widely from platform to platform, a lot of sellers fall back on listing everywhere and hoping something sticks, which just multiplies the busywork of separate uploads and separate descriptions for every marketplace. Reclaim: Sell with AI crosslists the same photo to both eBay and Facebook Marketplace at once, so an item can go to whichever platform's fee structure actually fits its category without rewriting the listing or redoing the pricing math by hand.
Hidden costs that don't appear in the fee percentage but reduce take-home further
Layering multiple fee types together, item commission, payment processing, and shipping-inclusive math, grows the real take-home gap between two platforms on the same item substantially. That's a big enough number to justify picking a channel on purpose instead of defaulting to whichever one is most familiar. Figuring out which platform's stack leaves the most cash in the seller's pocket is the only sound basis for a listing decision, and it's exactly the kind of comparison a pricing engine built on actual sold data can answer in seconds rather than a spreadsheet.
Shipping materials cost money whether or not they show up in a platform's fee disclosure: boxes, bubble wrap, tape, and the trip to the post office all come out of the seller's margin before the commission even applies. Returns and buyer disputes carry their own cost too, in time if nothing else, and some platforms handle that process more smoothly than others. Promoted listings and optional boosts, offered on more than one of the platforms above, add a further percentage for sellers chasing visibility, and that spend needs to be weighed against whatever extra sale price it actually produces. None of these costs appear anywhere near the headline commission number, and all of them come straight out of the same number that matters most: what actually lands in the seller's account once the sale is done.


